Cana­dians are focused on just meet­ing their most basic needs

This opinion was written by David Coletto, Oksana Kishchuk, and Eddie Sheppard, and was published by the Toronto Star on October 26, 2025.

If you want to under­stand Canada in 2025, don’t look up, look down. Before focus­ing on ideals like pur­pose, self­expres­sion or “liv­ing your best life,” most Cana­dians are doing something much more basic: try­ing to make ends meet and keep their fam­il­ies steady.

For the past year at Aba­cus Data, we’ve described a national mood that moved from scarcity (“Is there enough?”) to pre­car­ity (“Will we be OK?”).

Pre­car­ity is that uneasy feel­ing that even if you can pay the bills this month, you’re not sure you’ll be able to next month. It shrinks time hori­zons and makes prudence feel like a sur­vival skill. In our latest national sur­vey of 4,501 adults (Oct. 915), we tested where people’s atten­tion really sits. Bor­row­ing from Maslow’s hier­archy of needs, we asked which of five goals best describes what they’re most focused on right now: meet­ing basic needs (food, hous­ing, daily essen­tials); keep­ing the fam­ily safe, healthy and fin­an­cially stable; strength­en­ing rela­tion­ships; feel­ing respec­ted and con­fid­ent; or grow­ing and liv­ing a mean­ing­ful, joy­ful life.

The answers are blunt. Twenty­seven per cent chose basic needs as their top focus. Another thirty­eight per cent named safety, health and fin­an­cial sta­bil­ity. Add those together and two in three Cana­dians are con­cen­trat­ing on the two low­est rungs of Maslow’s lad­der. Belong­ing (eight per cent), esteem (nine per cent) and self­actu­al­iz­a­tion (18 per cent) are still in the mix, but they’re not where most people’s heads are.

This is exactly what pre­car­ity looks like. When life feels unstable, atten­tion nar­rows to focus on sta­bil­ity. People don’t stop want­ing mean­ing or con­nec­tion; but they are just try­ing to get or stay on life’s first base. It’s a reminder that we’re liv­ing in a coun­try more focused on endur­ance than ambi­tion and that has big implic­a­tions for busi­ness, polit­ics, and com­munity life.

In prac­tical terms, pre­car­ity means a young pro­fes­sional delays buy­ing a condo because her job is “temp until fur­ther notice,” or a uni­on­ized worker votes against a tent­at­ive agree­ment that offers a 30 per cent raise because there aren’t suf­fi­cient pro­tec­tions against wor­ries his job might be auto­mated in a few years.

For a retiree, it might mean skip­ping a winter trip or put­ting off a home repair because a fixed income no longer stretches as far as it used to, or the value of their home, which they spent a life­time pay­ing off, will sink in value and the next gro­cery or util­ity hike could upset a care­fully bal­anced budget.

The deeper story isn’t in the num­bers, though; it’s in how life stage shapes per­spect­ive. Younger Cana­dians tend to look up the lad­der, think­ing about growth, learn­ing and pur­pose — but are quickly pushed down when real­ity hits. As people age, atten­tion shifts down­ward.

The push and pull of mort­gages, kids and aging par­ents keep mid­life Cana­dians focused on secur­ity, and by retire­ment, safety clearly dom­in­ates.

For many baby boomers, espe­cially those 60 and over, the focus is less on chas­ing new goals and more on pro­tect­ing their health, sav­ings and a sense of sta­bil­ity. Even with rel­at­ive fin­an­cial com­fort, many feel the fra­gil­ity of fixed incomes and rising costs.

Gender doesn’t change the story much: men and women alike are mostly pre­oc­cu­pied with keep­ing life steady. No mat­ter who you are, the instinct right now is to hold the ground you’ve got.

Income and edu­ca­tion still define how high up the lad­der people can look, but what stands out now is the emo­tional dis­tance between those rungs. Unsur­pris­ingly, for lower­income Cana­dians, life feels close to the edge. Among higher earners, there’s more room to think about growth, learn­ing and con­fid­ence. Edu­ca­tion mir­rors that divide: those with a uni­versity degree are less pre­oc­cu­pied with sur­vival and more inves­ted in pro­gress and pur­pose. These con­trasts aren’t sur­pris­ing, but they remind us that optim­ism often depends on sta­bil­ity — and that a mes­sage about hope or ambi­tion can sound inspir­ing to some and tone­deaf to oth­ers.

Mind­set plays a role too. People who believe the coun­try is head­ing in the right dir­ec­tion are more focused on con­nec­tion, belong­ing and con­fid­ence. Those who think we’re on the wrong track are look­ing down, focused on the essen­tials. It’s a telling pat­tern. In an age of pre­car­ity, even con­fid­ence has become a scarce resource.

Iden­tity and back­ground still shape how Cana­dians see their place on the lad­der. Many new­comers and racial­ized Cana­dians, des­pite facing bar­ri­ers, are more likely to talk about growth and belong­ing than just get­ting by. Some of that reflects age and geo­graphy — they’re younger, more urban and often chas­ing oppor­tun­ity rather than defend­ing it — but it also hints at optim­ism. The idea of Canada as a place to build and become something bet­ter still res­on­ates, even as oth­ers worry the sys­tem is slip­ping. Where many long­time res­id­ents feel anxious about los­ing ground, new­comers are often focused on gain­ing it.

Polit­ics, too, reveals where people’s atten­tion rests. Con­ser­vat­ives and Lib­er­als tend to cluster around safety: steady jobs, stable fam­il­ies, pre­dict­able futures. New Demo­crats and Greens, whose sup­port­ers are younger and more likely to rent, lean toward the basics: afford­ab­il­ity, hous­ing and day­today sur­vival. Each party is, in its own way, speak­ing to a dif­fer­ent rung of the national hier­archy, one reason polit­ical debate often feels like par­al­lel con­ver­sa­tions about entirely dif­fer­ent needs.

A few caveats keep us hon­est. First, this shows what’s most on people’s minds right now — it doesn’t neces­sar­ily mean they’re strug­gling or going without. Choos­ing “safety” doesn’t mean your fam­ily is unsafe; it means that, right now, safety is what you’re think­ing about. A house­hold in the top bracket can still feel pre­cari­ous and plan defens­ively.

Second, our Maslow map­ping is a lens, not a law. Human motiv­a­tion is messier than a tidy pyr­amid. People chase mean­ing while jug­gling bills and nur­ture rela­tion­ships while updat­ing resumés.

Finally, per­cep­tion is its own real­ity when it comes to beha­viour. Whether the wobble is fin­an­cial, social or emo­tional, feel­ing pre­cari­ous changes how people work, shop, vote and plan.

So, what should lead­ers draw from this?

If you man­age people, earn the right to talk about pur­pose by deliv­er­ing solid ground first: pay that keeps up, pre­dict­able sched­ules, bene­fits that cover the gaps, espe­cially health and men­tal health, and man­agers who respect people’s time.

If you sell to ser­vices or things, design for value and pre­dict­ab­il­ity; com­munity and status will mat­ter again, but right now products that reduce risk and remove fric­tion win.

If you’re seek­ing office, build a coali­tion around secur­ity that enables aspir­a­tion: steady hous­ing sup­ply, work­ing health care, depend­able infra­struc­ture and relief from price whip­lash paired with a cred­ible path up the lad­der through skills, innov­a­tion and cli­mate action.

In the end, this isn’t a story about a coun­try that has given up on mean­ing; it’s a coun­try that has learned to keep one hand on the guard­rail.

The hier­archy hasn’t dis­ap­peared. People still want con­nec­tion, respect and growth, but the order of oper­a­tions has changed. And here’s the uncom­fort­able truth: pre­car­ity and uncer­tainty may be our default for the fore­see­able future.

Maybe we adapt and get bet­ter at decid­ing under con­stant uncer­tainty.

Maybe we grow numb to the wobble and lower our expect­a­tions. We don’t know.

What we do know, as poll­sters who ask thou­sands of Cana­dians hun­dreds of ques­tions every week is this: mind­set is already reshap­ing pri­or­it­ies like how people work, what they buy and the policies they’ll accept.

Lead­ers who take that ser­i­ously, who reduce volat­il­ity where they can, reas­sure anxious minds and hearts, and speak hon­estly about the risks where they can’t, will earn trust. Until the ground feels steady again, the smartest prom­ise isn’t a moon shot. It’s the steady hand that makes tomor­row feel pos­sible.