We’re los­ing the rat race

INSIDE Toronto’s rodent pop­u­la­tion is boom­ing, study finds

Of the 16 cities the study analyzed, 11 had significant spikes in rat populations, led by Washington, San Francisco and Toronto.

This article was written by Amy Dempsey Raven and Kate Allen, and was published in the Toronto Star on February 1, 2025.

Toronto’s rat pop­u­la­tion is grow­ing faster than the rodents of New York City, Chicago or Ams­ter­dam, accord­ing to a new study, illu­min­at­ing how cli­mate change and urb­an­iz­a­tion are tur­bochar­ging rat growth in the absence of effect­ive con­trol strategies.

Res­id­ents who have com­plained for years about a per­ceived rodent surge now have peer­re­viewed evid­ence, pub­lished in the journal Sci­ence Advances on Fri­day, that lays bare the scale of Toronto’s prob­lem. Of the 16 cit­ies ana­lyzed, Toronto had the third­fast­est grow­ing rat pop­u­la­tion.

The sci­ent­ists who led the research say their find­ings should com­pel cit­ies to invest in coordin­ated mit­ig­a­tion strategies — or in Toronto’s case, cre­ate one in the first place. City offi­cials have been tasked to pro­duce a rat strategy by later this year, after two pre­vi­ous efforts were shelved.

Cur­rently, Toronto does not have a ded­ic­ated depart­ment or officer in charge of tack­ling its boom­ing rat pop­u­la­tion.

“For a city of that size, that’s a glar­ing omis­sion,” said Jonathan Richard­son, a pro­fessor of bio­logy at the Uni­versity of Rich­mond in Vir­ginia and the new study’s lead author. Richard­son’s research was promp­ted by news reports from dif­fer­ent cit­ies com­plain­ing of rising rat prob­lems. As an urban eco­lo­gist, he wanted to put real num­bers to those con­cerns.

“Naively, I was like, OK, let’s just dive into this and get all the data that’s avail­able, and we’ll be able to do this for dozens, if not a hun­dred cit­ies, and see what’s hap­pen­ing,” he said. “But it turned out, data was really hard to come by.”

Because so few cit­ies had reli­able longterm rat data, the sci­ent­ists were “pretty dis­cour­aged” to only get inform­a­tion from 13 U. S. cit­ies and three inter­na­tion­ally.

The study relies on pub­lic com­plaints, which in Toronto come from the 311 report­ing sys­tem. While Richard­son and oth­ers said this type of data is imper­fect — it can’t reli­ably demon­strate dif­fer­ences among neigh­bour­hoods, for example, because people with insec­ure cit­izen­ship or rental status may be less likely to report — it can still illus­trate longterm trends.

“It’s the best we have, at the moment, to answer a ques­tion like this,” said Kaylee Byers, a senior sci­ent­ist with the Pacific Insti­tute on Patho­gens, Pan­dem­ics and Soci­ety at Simon Fraser Uni­versity, who was not involved in the study, but spent years research­ing urban rats and dis­ease eco­logy as part of the Van­couver Rat Project.

To learn how rats are estab­lish­ing them­selves in cit­ies and respond­ing to cli­mate change, “we really want to invest in muni­cipal strategies that track actual num­bers of rats across cit­ies and over time,” Byers said.

Cit­ies aren’t doing that because track­ing rats is expens­ive, time­con­sum­ing and often not a top pri­or­ity, she added.

Of the 16 cit­ies the study ana­lyzed, 11 had sig­ni­fic­ant increases in rat pop­u­la­tions, led by Wash­ing­ton, San Fran­cisco and Toronto. Only three exper­i­enced declines: Tokyo, New Orleans and Louis­ville, Ky.

When the sci­ent­ists ana­lyzed the rela­tion­ship between these trends and the urban envir­on­ment, they found that the biggest influ­ence on rat growth was cli­mate warm­ing: the cit­ies that saw the biggest tem­per­at­ure increases over their his­tor­ical baseline aver­age also saw lar­ger booms in rat num­bers.

Toronto is 1.9 degrees warmer than its his­tor­ical aver­age, the fast­est warm­ing city in the study after New York, accord­ing to the study’s data.

Exper­i­ments in lab rats have shown that they are very respons­ive to tem­per­at­ure, Richard­son explained. Cold tem­per­at­ures act like a brake on rat repro­duct­ive cycles, and warm­ing releases that brake. For­aging gets easier too. Fewer rats die in deep winter if those peri­ods get warmer. It’s unclear which of these is hap­pen­ing, or if it’s all three.

After cli­mate warm­ing, urb­an­iz­a­tion and pop­u­la­tion dens­ity also had a big impact, likely because they cre­ate more hab­itat and food sources for rats to exploit.

Study coau­thor Bobby Cor­rigan, a rodento­lo­gist who leads New York City’s Rat Academy, said that when green space is replaced by build­ings, it cre­ates more “sub­ter­ranean infra­struc­ture” — under­ground pipes, sewer lines and crevices — where rats thrive.

“There is a rat world right below our feet,” Cor­rigan said, but it’s dif­fi­cult to exam­ine those spaces .

City of Toronto staff declined to provide more details about the inpro­gress rat action plan, or say if it would move up its com­ple­tion due to res­id­ents’ con­cerns.

“Like most major cit­ies, rodents are com­mon in Toronto,” said spokes­per­son Rus­sell Baker. “While the City of Toronto is unable to track the total rodent pop­u­la­tion in Toronto,” the city is “always open” to try­ing to improve its rodent con­trol, Baker said, cit­ing last year’s dir­ec­tion from coun­cil to explore an “inter­di­vi­sional action plan,” due later this year.

This is not Toronto’s first attempt at cre­at­ing a rat strategy.

In 2018, after what became known as “the sum­mer of rats,” city coun­cil asked staff to come up with a plan. A policy team worked for 18 months, but it was never fin­ished. City staff said it was shelved due to pan­demi­cre­lated resource con­straints.

Since then, roden­tre­lated prop­erty stand­ards com­plaints have shot up 70 per cent, prompt­ing the latest push for a strategy.

The study authors said their find­ings make a case for cit­ies to com­mit more resources to rat mit­ig­a­tion and start col­lect­ing reli­able and sys­tem­atic data.

Urban rat strategies should focus on integ­rated pest man­age­ment, which emphas­izes mon­it­or­ing, remov­ing food sources ( namely, trash) and shor­ing up infra­struc­ture weak­nesses as first steps, with chem­ical tools such as rodenti­cide baits meant to be a last resort, said Cor­rigan.

Cor­rigan, who works for the New York City Depart­ment of Health, said we should beware rats’ poten­tial as car­ri­ers of dis­ease patho­gens.

“The big takeaway is this is not going to get bet­ter,” Cor­rigan said, as cli­mate change cre­ates a more favour­able envir­on­ment for urban wild­life. “And the ques­tion is, are we ready?”

“ The big takeaway is this is not going to get bet­ter. BOBBY CORRIGAN RODENTOLOGIST WHO LEADS NEW YORK CITY’S RAT ACADEMY

RODENT COMPLAINTS IN TORONTO RELATED TO PROPERTY STANDARDS VIOLATIONS