Cana­dians are focused on just meet­ing their most basic needs

This opinion was written by David Coletto, Oksana Kishchuk, and Eddie Sheppard, and was published by the Toronto Star on October 26, 2025.

If you want to under­stand Canada in 2025, don’t look up, look down. Before focus­ing on ideals like pur­pose, self­expres­sion or “liv­ing your best life,” most Cana­dians are doing something much more basic: try­ing to make ends meet and keep their fam­il­ies steady.

For the past year at Aba­cus Data, we’ve described a national mood that moved from scarcity (“Is there enough?”) to pre­car­ity (“Will we be OK?”).

Pre­car­ity is that uneasy feel­ing that even if you can pay the bills this month, you’re not sure you’ll be able to next month. It shrinks time hori­zons and makes prudence feel like a sur­vival skill. In our latest national sur­vey of 4,501 adults (Oct. 915), we tested where people’s atten­tion really sits. Bor­row­ing from Maslow’s hier­archy of needs, we asked which of five goals best describes what they’re most focused on right now: meet­ing basic needs (food, hous­ing, daily essen­tials); keep­ing the fam­ily safe, healthy and fin­an­cially stable; strength­en­ing rela­tion­ships; feel­ing respec­ted and con­fid­ent; or grow­ing and liv­ing a mean­ing­ful, joy­ful life.

The answers are blunt. Twenty­seven per cent chose basic needs as their top focus. Another thirty­eight per cent named safety, health and fin­an­cial sta­bil­ity. Add those together and two in three Cana­dians are con­cen­trat­ing on the two low­est rungs of Maslow’s lad­der. Belong­ing (eight per cent), esteem (nine per cent) and self­actu­al­iz­a­tion (18 per cent) are still in the mix, but they’re not where most people’s heads are.

This is exactly what pre­car­ity looks like. When life feels unstable, atten­tion nar­rows to focus on sta­bil­ity. People don’t stop want­ing mean­ing or con­nec­tion; but they are just try­ing to get or stay on life’s first base. It’s a reminder that we’re liv­ing in a coun­try more focused on endur­ance than ambi­tion and that has big implic­a­tions for busi­ness, polit­ics, and com­munity life.

In prac­tical terms, pre­car­ity means a young pro­fes­sional delays buy­ing a condo because her job is “temp until fur­ther notice,” or a uni­on­ized worker votes against a tent­at­ive agree­ment that offers a 30 per cent raise because there aren’t suf­fi­cient pro­tec­tions against wor­ries his job might be auto­mated in a few years.

For a retiree, it might mean skip­ping a winter trip or put­ting off a home repair because a fixed income no longer stretches as far as it used to, or the value of their home, which they spent a life­time pay­ing off, will sink in value and the next gro­cery or util­ity hike could upset a care­fully bal­anced budget.

The deeper story isn’t in the num­bers, though; it’s in how life stage shapes per­spect­ive. Younger Cana­dians tend to look up the lad­der, think­ing about growth, learn­ing and pur­pose — but are quickly pushed down when real­ity hits. As people age, atten­tion shifts down­ward.

The push and pull of mort­gages, kids and aging par­ents keep mid­life Cana­dians focused on secur­ity, and by retire­ment, safety clearly dom­in­ates.

For many baby boomers, espe­cially those 60 and over, the focus is less on chas­ing new goals and more on pro­tect­ing their health, sav­ings and a sense of sta­bil­ity. Even with rel­at­ive fin­an­cial com­fort, many feel the fra­gil­ity of fixed incomes and rising costs.

Gender doesn’t change the story much: men and women alike are mostly pre­oc­cu­pied with keep­ing life steady. No mat­ter who you are, the instinct right now is to hold the ground you’ve got.

Income and edu­ca­tion still define how high up the lad­der people can look, but what stands out now is the emo­tional dis­tance between those rungs. Unsur­pris­ingly, for lower­income Cana­dians, life feels close to the edge. Among higher earners, there’s more room to think about growth, learn­ing and con­fid­ence. Edu­ca­tion mir­rors that divide: those with a uni­versity degree are less pre­oc­cu­pied with sur­vival and more inves­ted in pro­gress and pur­pose. These con­trasts aren’t sur­pris­ing, but they remind us that optim­ism often depends on sta­bil­ity — and that a mes­sage about hope or ambi­tion can sound inspir­ing to some and tone­deaf to oth­ers.

Mind­set plays a role too. People who believe the coun­try is head­ing in the right dir­ec­tion are more focused on con­nec­tion, belong­ing and con­fid­ence. Those who think we’re on the wrong track are look­ing down, focused on the essen­tials. It’s a telling pat­tern. In an age of pre­car­ity, even con­fid­ence has become a scarce resource.

Iden­tity and back­ground still shape how Cana­dians see their place on the lad­der. Many new­comers and racial­ized Cana­dians, des­pite facing bar­ri­ers, are more likely to talk about growth and belong­ing than just get­ting by. Some of that reflects age and geo­graphy — they’re younger, more urban and often chas­ing oppor­tun­ity rather than defend­ing it — but it also hints at optim­ism. The idea of Canada as a place to build and become something bet­ter still res­on­ates, even as oth­ers worry the sys­tem is slip­ping. Where many long­time res­id­ents feel anxious about los­ing ground, new­comers are often focused on gain­ing it.

Polit­ics, too, reveals where people’s atten­tion rests. Con­ser­vat­ives and Lib­er­als tend to cluster around safety: steady jobs, stable fam­il­ies, pre­dict­able futures. New Demo­crats and Greens, whose sup­port­ers are younger and more likely to rent, lean toward the basics: afford­ab­il­ity, hous­ing and day­today sur­vival. Each party is, in its own way, speak­ing to a dif­fer­ent rung of the national hier­archy, one reason polit­ical debate often feels like par­al­lel con­ver­sa­tions about entirely dif­fer­ent needs.

A few caveats keep us hon­est. First, this shows what’s most on people’s minds right now — it doesn’t neces­sar­ily mean they’re strug­gling or going without. Choos­ing “safety” doesn’t mean your fam­ily is unsafe; it means that, right now, safety is what you’re think­ing about. A house­hold in the top bracket can still feel pre­cari­ous and plan defens­ively.

Second, our Maslow map­ping is a lens, not a law. Human motiv­a­tion is messier than a tidy pyr­amid. People chase mean­ing while jug­gling bills and nur­ture rela­tion­ships while updat­ing resumés.

Finally, per­cep­tion is its own real­ity when it comes to beha­viour. Whether the wobble is fin­an­cial, social or emo­tional, feel­ing pre­cari­ous changes how people work, shop, vote and plan.

So, what should lead­ers draw from this?

If you man­age people, earn the right to talk about pur­pose by deliv­er­ing solid ground first: pay that keeps up, pre­dict­able sched­ules, bene­fits that cover the gaps, espe­cially health and men­tal health, and man­agers who respect people’s time.

If you sell to ser­vices or things, design for value and pre­dict­ab­il­ity; com­munity and status will mat­ter again, but right now products that reduce risk and remove fric­tion win.

If you’re seek­ing office, build a coali­tion around secur­ity that enables aspir­a­tion: steady hous­ing sup­ply, work­ing health care, depend­able infra­struc­ture and relief from price whip­lash paired with a cred­ible path up the lad­der through skills, innov­a­tion and cli­mate action.

In the end, this isn’t a story about a coun­try that has given up on mean­ing; it’s a coun­try that has learned to keep one hand on the guard­rail.

The hier­archy hasn’t dis­ap­peared. People still want con­nec­tion, respect and growth, but the order of oper­a­tions has changed. And here’s the uncom­fort­able truth: pre­car­ity and uncer­tainty may be our default for the fore­see­able future.

Maybe we adapt and get bet­ter at decid­ing under con­stant uncer­tainty.

Maybe we grow numb to the wobble and lower our expect­a­tions. We don’t know.

What we do know, as poll­sters who ask thou­sands of Cana­dians hun­dreds of ques­tions every week is this: mind­set is already reshap­ing pri­or­it­ies like how people work, what they buy and the policies they’ll accept.

Lead­ers who take that ser­i­ously, who reduce volat­il­ity where they can, reas­sure anxious minds and hearts, and speak hon­estly about the risks where they can’t, will earn trust. Until the ground feels steady again, the smartest prom­ise isn’t a moon shot. It’s the steady hand that makes tomor­row feel pos­sible.

No relief from the heat

Mayor cites `ser­i­ous gaps’ in city’s strategy amid anger over pool clos­ures

The Giovanni Caboto pool was closed in midafternoon on Monday due to “unsafe pool clarity” amid scorching temperatures.

This article was written by Kate Allen and was published in the Toronto Star on June 24, 2025.

As Toronto struggled under a second con­sec­ut­ive day of sear­ing tem­per­at­ures, Mayor Olivia Chow acknow­ledged “ser­i­ous gaps” in the city’s heat relief strategy and apo­lo­gized for untimely pool clos­ures, say­ing “we must do bet­ter.”

Chow respon­ded Monday to the cri­ti­cism of res­id­ents — and Premier Doug Ford — who dis­covered some pub­lic pools had shuttered on Sunday, des­pite the city advert­ising exten­ded hours at facil­it­ies as part of its plan to pro­tect res­id­ents from the ongo­ing heat wave.

City staff said that 19 pools closed for any­where from 45 minutes to almost five hours to ensure the safety of staff work­ing in heat that felt like 46 C with the humi­dex,

tying a June record. Monday notched new highs too, regis­ter­ing 36 C, a still­unof­fi­cial daily record.

“Pools need to be open dur­ing the heat wave — that’s pretty obvi­ous,” Chow told report­ers, adding, “We apo­lo­gize for that. This can­not hap­pen again.”

In addi­tion to deploy­ing more life­guards and adding on­call med­ical staff to ensure pools can stay open, Chow vowed to bring for­ward a motion at city coun­cil this week to address what a state­ment released by her office called “ser­i­ous gaps” in the city’s heat relief strategy. The motion includes ask­ing the city man­ager to report back later this year on improve­ments like restor­ing 24­7 cool­ing centres and cre­at­ing a new “chief heat officer” pos­i­tion.

Advoc­ates ques­tioned why these fixes were com­ing now, when heat waves hit every sum­mer — and when stud­ies have shown for years they are becom­ing more fre­quent and intense because of cli­mate change.

They said that for some of Toronto’s most vul­ner­able res­id­ents, includ­ing home­less people and older adults, pools were never an adequate solu­tion, and any improve­ments recom­men­ded in the fall would still leave res­id­ents at risk for the rest of the sea­son.

“Sum­mer is not a sur­prise. We know that sum­mer is com­ing,” said Lor­raine Lam, an out­reach worker with the Shel­ter and Hous­ing Justice Net­work. Lam called the fall due date for recom­mend­a­tions “ridicu­lous,” adding that she and oth­ers had reques­ted a meet­ing with the mayor in Feb­ru­ary to dis­cuss this sum­mer’s hot weather, and fol­lowed up in May.

“The fact that the city is act­ing like, `Oh, we didn’t know this is com­ing and we’re going to look into options for a few months down the road’ is com­pletely unac­cept­able, in my opin­ion. Because, what’s hap­pen­ing in the mean­time?”

Premier Ford weighed in on Toronto pool clos­ures Monday, telling News­talk 1010’s Jerry Agar that “I’m not hear­ing this any­where else in the province.”

“Let’s be clear, the pools should be open for people to cool down,” he added. “When there’s hot days, the pools should be open.”

On Monday after­noon, des­pite Chow’s assur­ances, some would­be swim­mers still encountered prob­lems. Lukas Gaucher said he drove for an hour from Ajax, hop­ing to hit the pool at the Joseph J. Pic­ci­ninni Com­munity Centre in Toronto’s west end.

But when he arrived at the park, he met a dis­ap­poin­ted crowd locked out of the Gio­vanni Caboto pool.

Accord­ing to the “Cool Spaces Near You” map that the city released to help res­id­ents find heat relief centres, it opened at noon on Monday. But people inside the com­munity centre told the Star the pool would open at 4 p.m. On the gate out­side, a notice from the city explained it had to be closed due to “unsafe pool clar­ity.”

Johnny Mag and his 16­year­old son, Samuel, paced out­side the locked­off pool. They’d been bounced around from swim­ming hole to swim­ming hole. No city staff or elec­ted offi­cial seemed to be able to provide clar­ity or relief from the heat.

“What the mayor is say­ing, what you see on TV, it’s totally oppos­ite,” said Mag. “We went to York Civic Centre, pool’s closed, indoor and out­door. We called 311, they don’t know what’s going on. You guys work at the city and you have no idea what pools are open? It’s a heat wave. People are hot!”

Lam, however, ques­tioned the focus on pools, ask­ing where unhoused people were sup­posed to find bathing suits, or whether it was a good strategy for seni­ors, who are espe­cially vul­ner­able to heat ill­ness: “What are you going to do? Sit in the pool for like 12 hours? It’s not real­istic.”

Cathy Crowe, a long­time street nurse, said that the city’s shift in 2019 from around­the­clock cool­ing centres to its cur­rent net­work of “cool spaces” that include lib­rar­ies, malls and other facil­it­ies that are only open dur­ing busi­ness hours served the broader pub­lic but neg­lected the needs of the most vul­ner­able.

In a let­ter on Monday sent to coun­cil­lors and the mayor, Crowe wrote that the cool­ing centres were “life­sav­ing” and that the cur­rent net­work of 500 cool spaces is “inad­equate in this emer­gency.”

When pressed by report­ers Monday, Chow said the city man­ager’s recom­mend­a­tions could come before the end of the year. She also cited a pilot pro­gram to provide air con­di­tion­ing units to low­income seni­ors, which the city estim­ated will provide 300 to 400 units, and for which the applic­a­tion pro­cess closed earlier this month.

The fact that the city is act­ing like, `Oh, we didn’t know this is com­ing and we’re going to look into options for a few months down the road’ is com­pletely unac­cept­able, in my opin­ion. LORRAINE LAM SHELTER AND HOUSING JUSTICE NETWORK