This opinion was written by David Coletto, Oksana Kishchuk, and Eddie Sheppard, and was published by the Toronto Star on October 26, 2025.
If you want to understand Canada in 2025, don’t look up, look down. Before focusing on ideals like purpose, selfexpression or “living your best life,” most Canadians are doing something much more basic: trying to make ends meet and keep their families steady.
For the past year at Abacus Data, we’ve described a national mood that moved from scarcity (“Is there enough?”) to precarity (“Will we be OK?”).
Precarity is that uneasy feeling that even if you can pay the bills this month, you’re not sure you’ll be able to next month. It shrinks time horizons and makes prudence feel like a survival skill. In our latest national survey of 4,501 adults (Oct. 915), we tested where people’s attention really sits. Borrowing from Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, we asked which of five goals best describes what they’re most focused on right now: meeting basic needs (food, housing, daily essentials); keeping the family safe, healthy and financially stable; strengthening relationships; feeling respected and confident; or growing and living a meaningful, joyful life.
The answers are blunt. Twentyseven per cent chose basic needs as their top focus. Another thirtyeight per cent named safety, health and financial stability. Add those together and two in three Canadians are concentrating on the two lowest rungs of Maslow’s ladder. Belonging (eight per cent), esteem (nine per cent) and selfactualization (18 per cent) are still in the mix, but they’re not where most people’s heads are.
This is exactly what precarity looks like. When life feels unstable, attention narrows to focus on stability. People don’t stop wanting meaning or connection; but they are just trying to get or stay on life’s first base. It’s a reminder that we’re living in a country more focused on endurance than ambition and that has big implications for business, politics, and community life.
In practical terms, precarity means a young professional delays buying a condo because her job is “temp until further notice,” or a unionized worker votes against a tentative agreement that offers a 30 per cent raise because there aren’t sufficient protections against worries his job might be automated in a few years.
For a retiree, it might mean skipping a winter trip or putting off a home repair because a fixed income no longer stretches as far as it used to, or the value of their home, which they spent a lifetime paying off, will sink in value and the next grocery or utility hike could upset a carefully balanced budget.
The deeper story isn’t in the numbers, though; it’s in how life stage shapes perspective. Younger Canadians tend to look up the ladder, thinking about growth, learning and purpose — but are quickly pushed down when reality hits. As people age, attention shifts downward.
The push and pull of mortgages, kids and aging parents keep midlife Canadians focused on security, and by retirement, safety clearly dominates.
For many baby boomers, especially those 60 and over, the focus is less on chasing new goals and more on protecting their health, savings and a sense of stability. Even with relative financial comfort, many feel the fragility of fixed incomes and rising costs.
Gender doesn’t change the story much: men and women alike are mostly preoccupied with keeping life steady. No matter who you are, the instinct right now is to hold the ground you’ve got.
Income and education still define how high up the ladder people can look, but what stands out now is the emotional distance between those rungs. Unsurprisingly, for lowerincome Canadians, life feels close to the edge. Among higher earners, there’s more room to think about growth, learning and confidence. Education mirrors that divide: those with a university degree are less preoccupied with survival and more invested in progress and purpose. These contrasts aren’t surprising, but they remind us that optimism often depends on stability — and that a message about hope or ambition can sound inspiring to some and tonedeaf to others.
Mindset plays a role too. People who believe the country is heading in the right direction are more focused on connection, belonging and confidence. Those who think we’re on the wrong track are looking down, focused on the essentials. It’s a telling pattern. In an age of precarity, even confidence has become a scarce resource.
Identity and background still shape how Canadians see their place on the ladder. Many newcomers and racialized Canadians, despite facing barriers, are more likely to talk about growth and belonging than just getting by. Some of that reflects age and geography — they’re younger, more urban and often chasing opportunity rather than defending it — but it also hints at optimism. The idea of Canada as a place to build and become something better still resonates, even as others worry the system is slipping. Where many longtime residents feel anxious about losing ground, newcomers are often focused on gaining it.
Politics, too, reveals where people’s attention rests. Conservatives and Liberals tend to cluster around safety: steady jobs, stable families, predictable futures. New Democrats and Greens, whose supporters are younger and more likely to rent, lean toward the basics: affordability, housing and daytoday survival. Each party is, in its own way, speaking to a different rung of the national hierarchy, one reason political debate often feels like parallel conversations about entirely different needs.
A few caveats keep us honest. First, this shows what’s most on people’s minds right now — it doesn’t necessarily mean they’re struggling or going without. Choosing “safety” doesn’t mean your family is unsafe; it means that, right now, safety is what you’re thinking about. A household in the top bracket can still feel precarious and plan defensively.
Second, our Maslow mapping is a lens, not a law. Human motivation is messier than a tidy pyramid. People chase meaning while juggling bills and nurture relationships while updating resumés.
Finally, perception is its own reality when it comes to behaviour. Whether the wobble is financial, social or emotional, feeling precarious changes how people work, shop, vote and plan.
So, what should leaders draw from this?
If you manage people, earn the right to talk about purpose by delivering solid ground first: pay that keeps up, predictable schedules, benefits that cover the gaps, especially health and mental health, and managers who respect people’s time.
If you sell to services or things, design for value and predictability; community and status will matter again, but right now products that reduce risk and remove friction win.
If you’re seeking office, build a coalition around security that enables aspiration: steady housing supply, working health care, dependable infrastructure and relief from price whiplash paired with a credible path up the ladder through skills, innovation and climate action.
In the end, this isn’t a story about a country that has given up on meaning; it’s a country that has learned to keep one hand on the guardrail.
The hierarchy hasn’t disappeared. People still want connection, respect and growth, but the order of operations has changed. And here’s the uncomfortable truth: precarity and uncertainty may be our default for the foreseeable future.
Maybe we adapt and get better at deciding under constant uncertainty.
Maybe we grow numb to the wobble and lower our expectations. We don’t know.
What we do know, as pollsters who ask thousands of Canadians hundreds of questions every week is this: mindset is already reshaping priorities like how people work, what they buy and the policies they’ll accept.
Leaders who take that seriously, who reduce volatility where they can, reassure anxious minds and hearts, and speak honestly about the risks where they can’t, will earn trust. Until the ground feels steady again, the smartest promise isn’t a moon shot. It’s the steady hand that makes tomorrow feel possible.